Which statement about fluency and construction of meaning is presented?

Which statement about fluency and construction of meaning is presented?

• A. Fluency is not needed to construct meaning
• B. Fluency is required for construction of meaning
• C. Fluency has no relation to comprehension
• D. Fluency should be ignored in instruction

Answer: (A)

Fluency describes how smoothly and quickly a reader can decode and read text, but meaning is built from decoding, vocabulary, background knowledge, and the strategies readers use to make sense of what they read. It’s possible to understand a passage even if reading isn’t fluent yet, by using context clues, rereading, and connecting ideas to what you already know. Fluency helps comprehension by freeing cognitive effort for understanding, but it isn’t strictly required for constructing meaning. That’s why this statement is the best fit: it recognizes that meaning can be constructed even when fluency isn’t fully developed, while still acknowledging that fluent reading generally supports easier and more efficient comprehension.

Fluency describes how smoothly and quickly a reader can decode and read text, but meaning is built from decoding, vocabulary, background knowledge, and the strategies readers use to make sense of what they read. It’s possible to understand a passage even if reading isn’t fluent yet, by using context clues, rereading, and connecting ideas to what you already know. Fluency helps comprehension by freeing cognitive effort for understanding, but it isn’t strictly required for constructing meaning. That’s why this statement is the best fit: it recognizes that meaning can be constructed even when fluency isn’t fully developed, while still acknowledging that fluent reading generally supports easier and more efficient comprehension.